Came across this in Bob Mankoff’s blog today.
You should check out Saul Steinberg’s cartoons, they are a nice blend of cartoon humour and art and philosophy as Bob points out and anyone with a headshot like this deserves a look.
Anyway what caught my eye was the word balloon. Something that I have been messing around with lately.
Does that need punctuation? Who cares? Who needs punctuation when your word balloons don’t necessarily contain words
Or at least words not necessary to read in sentences or spoken phrases. 
or in the case of my personal favourite balloons, maybe it should be punctuation only.
I often wonder about the hang up with words. I’ve been told many a time that it’s not just language. A while back I posted Bob’s investigation of captions vs. captionless cartoons. Personally, I enjoy the wordless joke, saying so much without the need for language, though I am fond of wordplay which I often find myself talking about while out for coffee (coffeeng?). Bit of a stretch there. I am not entirely against captions, but so often you get a bad gag or poorly written or readers can challenge it with something better, which I suppose is the nature of the New Yorker caption contest. Worst of all is the atrocity committed by Family Circus on a regular basis.
Word balloon and continued speaking part in the caption. Drives me crazy when I see cartoons put together like this. If you’re going to do word balloon and caption, at least do it right.
From Sumi Ink Club a couple of weekends ago. I’ve attended the very beginnings of one before, but was unable to stick around. Interesting take on collaborative drawing. Ink only, no text, move around draw into other drawings. Not sure the reason behind the rules, but it does bring out some uniformity in the work. With a very mixed bag of people and ages interesting to see how outline and white space are the norm. I will post some Drink and Draw works soon to give some contrast in approaches to drawing games. 
office of surrealist investigations 
